Legal Opinion
Nurre v. Whitehead
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 20, 2007No. C06-901RSLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. # 8) (hereinafter “Motion”) and “Plaintiff Nurre’s Motion for Summary Judgment Under CR 56(A)” (Dkt. # 17) (hereinafter “Cross-Motion”). In June of 2006, the Henry A. Jackson High School (“JHS”) Wind Ensemble was not allowed to perform Franz Biebl’s instrumental arrangement of “Ave Maria” at the 2006 JHS graduation ceremony in Everett, Washington.…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nurre v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials v. NoonanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Nurre v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Nurre v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009