Meissner v. Paulson
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARLER, J.
After a fire on premises leased to Richard Paulson, Ernest Meissner, the landlord, and his insurer, United Pacific/Reliance Insurance Companies (collectively the plaintiffs), sued Paulson for rent owed after the premises had been restored and for damages caused by the fire. Paulson died during the discovery phase of the case. The parties stipulated the Estate of Paulson would be substituted as nominal defendant, but that any judgment would be recovered from Paulson’s insurer, Fremont Indemnity Company, the real party in interest (collectively the defendants). Before the case…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Randles v. LowryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Hutchins v. WatersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3Cited by25 opinions
- Barella v. Exchange BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Santantonio v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Taing v. Johnson Scaffolding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Nelson v. Pearson Ford Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Vick v. DaCORSICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.