United States v. Farr
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.
Skoshi Thedford Farr appeals her conviction for tax fraud. She alleges that during trial the government constructively amended the indictment against her — trying her not just for the crime described in the indictment but also for a separate and additional offense. We agree. The grand jury indicted Ms. Farr for one crime (failure to pay quarterly employment taxes for a medical clinic) but at trial the government pursued her for another offense (failure to pay a trust fund recovery penalty assessed against her personally). Under the Constitution, the government may only…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Medina-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. DeChristopherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Cruz-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. KaluCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.