Legal Opinion

United States v. Farr

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 19, 2008No. 07-6187PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.

Skoshi Thedford Farr appeals her conviction for tax fraud. She alleges that during trial the government constructively amended the indictment against her — trying her not just for the crime described in the indictment but also for a separate and additional offense. We agree. The grand jury indicted Ms. Farr for one crime (failure to pay quarterly employment taxes for a medical clinic) but at trial the government pursued her for another offense (failure to pay a trust fund recovery penalty assessed against her personally). Under the Constitution, the government may only…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. Medina-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. DeChristopherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Cruz-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. KaluCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API