Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Dissent
CLARK, Y. C. J.
(dissenting). I cannot-agree with the conclusion reached in this case for the reason it is necessary to review and weigh the evidence to arrive at the conclusion reached. The record discloses that, on or about tbe 1st day oí October, 1927, Joseph Brown, while in the employ oí petitioners herein, was engaged in the hazardous employment subject to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the state of Oklahoma, and while so employed, he, with other employees, were loading a 5 3-16 inch flow line, which is an iron pipe used in the oil fields.
The record further discloses…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Behan v. John B. Honor Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Blackburn v. Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Guyer v. Equitable Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Rhodes v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Utah-Idaho Central R. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.