Legal Opinion

Shipman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 4, 2015No. 1D14-3894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this Anders1 appeal, the State concedes that there is a double jeopardy violation which requires reversal for vacation of one of Appellant’s convictions. The information charged Appellant with sexual battery on a person aged 12 years or older, and lewd or lascivious battery on a person .aged 12 years or older but less than 16 years -of age, and the record indicates the charges were based upon the same event. Appellant entered an open plea to the court without reservation of this issue, but because this double jeopardy violation constitutes fundamental error, it may be addressed for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Binns v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. Tannihill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Hunt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deontae Palinski Johnson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  2. Jerry Richardson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  3. Richard L. Connolly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API