Legal Opinion

State v. Farabee

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2000No. 99-126PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Scott David Farabee appeals from orders of the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, denying his motion to suppress evidence and motion to reconsider. We affirm.

¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

¶3 1. Whether the District Court erred in determining that the officer who stopped Farabee had the requisite particularized suspicion?

¶4 2. Whether the District Court erred in denying Farabee’s motion to suppress evidence on the basis that the traffic stop was pretextual?

BACKGROUND

¶5 On November 24, 1997, Detectives Scott Rogstad and Vance Gehringer, officers employed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. BullockMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. GopherMontana Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  3. State v. LovegrenMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Fertig v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. BoyerMontana Supreme Court · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API