Legal Opinion
Marshall v. CHROMALLOY AM. CORP. FED. MALLEABLE DIV.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 12, 1977No. Civ. A. 77-C-291PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of the petitioner, Secretary of Labor, to show cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(d) as to why the respondent Chromalloy American Corporation, Federal Malleable Division, should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with an Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) inspection warrant, issued by U. S. Magistrate McBride, pursuant to § 8(a) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 657(a). For the reasons which follow, the petition will be granted.
The U. S. Magistrate has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brennan v. Gibson's Products, Inc. of PlanoDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re WORKSITE INSPECTION OF QUALITY PRODUCTS, INC., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Marshall v. Northwest Orient Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Marshall v. Weyerhaeuser Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
- Empire Steel Manufacturing Co. v. MarshallDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1977
- PELTON CASTEEL, INC., Et Al., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ray MARSHALL, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.