Legal Opinion

Nevious v. Bauer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 20, 1996No. 3-95-0628PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Michela

Plaintiff-appellant, James Nevious (plaintiff), brought an action against defendants-appellees, Keith Bauer and Marsha Bauer (defendants), under section 1 of the Illinois Domestic Animals Running At Large Act (the Act) (510 ILCS 55/1 et seq. (West 1994)) for injuries sustained in a vehicular collision with defendants’ bull. At the close of evidence, the trial court directed a verdict in defendants’ favor. Plaintiff appeals, contending the trial court misconstrued the burden of proof requirements under the Act, consequently erring in directing the verdict and abusing its discretion by refusing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. CrickmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Fugett v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  3. Zears v. DavisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Turgeon v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Johnson v. SleafordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Newell Co. v. PetersenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. Corona v. MalmAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. People Ex Rel. Klaeren v. Village of LisleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Raab v. FrankIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Christenson v. RinckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API