Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rose v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1970No. 6095PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*556OPINION

By the Court,

Zenoff, J. :

Edward Rose was a general agent for Pacific General Life Insurance Company. His employment was evidenced by a written contract which provided in particular that he was authorized to collect moneys only for the initial premiums, that all moneys held by him were as a fiduciary trust, and were not to be used for any personal or other purposes whatsoever.

Rose accepted the total sum of $6,500 from Rose Meredith and her husband so that they could reinstate their policies which had lapsed. Rose sent the company his personal check for $6,558 to cover the reinstatement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. WilcoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Grin v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. People v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State v. TrolsonNevada Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Greene v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Teamsters Local 533 v. Schultz (In Re Schultz)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1985
  3. Barron v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Arajakis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Batin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API