Legal Opinion

Pullins v. Hancock Whitney Bank

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided March 25, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00006Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NEKEIA PULLINS CIVIL NO. 19-00006 V. JUDGE SHELLY D. DICK HANCOCK WHITNEY BANK MAG. JUDGE ERIN WILDER- DOOMES RULING This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss1 by Defendant, Hancock Whitney Bank (“Defendant” or “Hancock”). Plaintiff, Nekeia Pullins (“Plaintiff”), has filed an Opposition,2 to which Defendant replied.3 Oral argument is not necessary. For the following reasons, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion should be granted and that Plaintiff shall be granted leave of court to amend her Complaint in accordance…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API