Ross v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Presiding Judge.
This appeal arises out of a conviction for robbery by assault wherein the punishment, enhanced under Article 62, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., was imposed by the court following a verdict of guilty at life.
The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is not challenged, and a recitation of the facts is not necessary to the grounds of error raised.
In two grounds of error appellant contends his extrajudicial confession should have been excluded because he was repeatedly asserting his right to counsel from the time of his arrest until the time of his confession…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hardin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Castillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Brito v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Love v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.