Legal Opinion

State v. Van Dorne

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2004No. 29379PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Judge Pro Tem.

Dawn Jeanine Van Dome appeals the district court’s order denying Van Dome’s motion to suppress. We affirm.

I

FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In the early morning hours of March 30, 2002, Van Dome was involved in a car accident with Hill. Van Dome got out of her car, had a conversation with Hill and Hill’s passengers, and after providing certain information to Hill, Van Dome left the scene. Hill and the other occupants of her vehicle believed Van Dome was under the influence of alcohol. According to Hill’s testimony, Hill contacted the police during Van Dome’s conversation…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Steven Linwood RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. State v. WeberIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BishopIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. CerinoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. HuntleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. SaloisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. Zapata-ReyesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API