Legal Opinion

Maquiling v. Principi

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided November 13, 1992No. 91-1512Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

On August 3, 1992, appellant filed an informal brief. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) or Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Acting Secretary) has previously filed two motions for extensions *486of tíme to file a response to appellant’s brief, asserting a heavy caseload as grounds for the extensions. The Court stamp-granted the foregoing motions. On October 29, 1992, the Acting Secretary filed a third motion for an extension of time until November 6, 1992, to file a response to appellant’s brief, asserting as grounds for the extension the same grounds as were asserted in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. MacWhorter v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  2. United States v. Anthony RaimondiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Kushindana v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  4. Dupell v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  5. Larue v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API