Legal Opinion

Dupell v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided May 11, 1992No. 90-1094PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was filed on October 3, 1991. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) subsequently submitted four motions, three of which were filed out of time, for extensions of time to file a response to appellant’s brief. On February 12, 1992, the Court granted the fourth of those motions, and stated: “The Court ... will grant the Secretary no further extensions of time to file a response to appellant’s brief absent extraordinary circumstances[;] ... The Court does not deem a heavy caseload ... to be such [a] circumstance[]”. (Emphasis in original.) On February 14, 1992, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony RaimondiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Kushindana v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  3. Pergola v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re A Proposed Amendment to Rule 26(b)United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
  2. Johnson v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  3. Maquiling v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API