Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eva Kollsman, City National Bank, Tashi Land Corporation, a New York Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 17, 1984No. 83-5798Published

1DissentReinhardt, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

I believe that the majority errs in holding that the district court abused its discretion by not abstaining from deciding the merits. There are no uncertain state law questions that must be resolved here. Rather, the case turns principally on a factual issue with a painfully obvious answer. Moreover, I believe that the majority’s disposition of the case illustrates how procedural rules intended to aid the federal judiciary in performing its duties can, if misapplied, serve to deprive parties of a fair and adequate resolution of their dispute. By unnecessarily and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  4. Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API