Legal Opinion

Metzinger v. Perry

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

An. examination of the record in this case convinces us that the right result was reached and no injustice to plaintiff done thereby, and for those reasons as well as by the authority of sec. 274.37, Stats., the judgment, should and must be affirmed. Braun v. M., St. P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 170 Wis. 10, 17, 172 N. W. 743.

The appellant has numerous assignments of error as grounds for his claim that the judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted. None of them, however, can have any substantial effect upon the controlling feature of this case, which i's embodied in the jury’s findings that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Karney v. BoydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Ogodziski v. GaraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Braun v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wirsing v. KrzeminskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Crotteau v. KarlgaardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Johnson v. RayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Vaughn v. MeschMontana Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API