Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Yost

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1898No. 8296PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from t'lie district court of York county. Tried below before Bates, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

Anthony Yost, in the district court bf York county, sued the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company for damages for injuries sustained by him by being struck by one of its engines. The claim of Yost ivas that the proximate-cause of the injury he had received ivas the negligence of the railroad company’s empl-oyés. He had judgment, to review which the railroad company has filed here a petition in error.

A contention of the railroad company is that the proximate cause of Yost’s injury was-his own negligence. Alger is a station on the line of the railroad company in the state of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. ElliottNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. KrayenbuhlNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LyonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dyerson v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Neary v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Wallenburg v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Kafka v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API