Legal Opinion
Small v. Wakefield
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 4, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Certiorari proceeding to determine the legality of an order made by the defendant, as judge of the-district court of the state of Iowa, in and for the fourth, judicial district, for the punishment of an alleged, contempt of court.
1Opinion of the CourtGtveN, J.
The single question presented for-our consideration arises out of the following agreed statement of facts. submitted as evidence in this case, to-wit:
“ First. That the hearing in the contempt proceedings in the case of Gr. H. Cummings v. Richard Small, wherein this defendant, it is alleged and claimed by the-plaintiff, has proceeded illegally, said hearing was had. upon evidence offered orally and taken down by W. E. Cody, official shorthand reporter in and for said fourth judicial district, upon the seventh day of July, 1890, and that at the close of said evidence said defendant directed and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Ross v. LoomisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Lutz v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Dorgan v. GrangerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- State v. GuisenhauseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. LevisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Teasdale v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Roberts v. FullerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Educational Film Exchanges, Inc. v. ThornburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. Wells & PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920