Legal Opinion

Scott v. Ranch Roy-L, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 2007No. ED 88991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherri B. Sullivan, J.

Introduction

James Scott and John Kuhlmann 1 (Appellants) appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Ranch Roy-L, Inc. (Ranch Roy-L), Gary Schaeffer and Jill M. Schaeffer (the Schaeffers) (Ranch Roy-L and the Schaeffers collectively referred to as Respondents) on Appellants’ First Amended Complaint and on Respondents’ Counterclaim, both of which sought declaratory and injunctive relief on the issues in question, to-wit, whether Ranch Roy-L is the successor Developer to one Roy Longstreet and whether as such Ranch Roy-L had the right to add and subdivide certain property to a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  4. Keisker v. FarmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  5. Scott v. Ranch Roy-L, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. WOODGLEN ESTATES ASS'N v. DulaneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Millstone Property Owners Association, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam of St. Louis, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, Fogarty Farms, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2024
  3. Millstone Property Owners Association, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam of St. Louis, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, and Fogerty Farms, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. State v. WattsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API