Legal Opinion
Tyler v. O'NEILL
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 24, 1999No. 2:99-cv-00136PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER District Judge.
By way of the motion which is now pending before this Court, Defendants seek to have Plaintiffs complaint dismissed in its entirety and with prejudice as barred by principles of res judicata. For the reasons which follow, Defendants’ motion shall be granted.
Factual Background
Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on January 11, 1999 seeking an injunction compelling defendants to issue 400 shares of stock in Hendrickson, Inc. which were purportedly never issued to him following his purchase of a 10% interest in the company in 1981 and to file amended income tax…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Gregory v. ChehiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brody v. HankinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Inofast Manufacturing, Inc. v. BardsleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Rutter v. RiveraDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Vega v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of TransportationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020