Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Tam Ceramics, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 28, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action and denying his motion for partial summary judgment on liability on his Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action. Plaintiff has not briefed the issues regarding denial of his motion for summary judgment on his Labor Law §§ 200 and 202-h causes of action; therefore, we deem those issues abandoned (see, Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984).
Plaintiff, an employee of third-party defendant,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Narrow v. Crane-Hogan Structural Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Laterra v. Rockville Centre Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Marotta v. Lakeside Memorial Hospital, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Abramo v. Pepsi-Cola Buffalo Bottling Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Irwin v. St. Joseph's Intercommunity HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Morris v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998