Legal Opinion

Leventhal v. Dockser

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 10, 1972PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff appeals from orders sustaining “with leave to amend denied” demurrers to the declarations in three actions, two in “tort” and one in “contract,” and from the additional sustaining of an answer in abatement filed in the contract action. The two tort actions represent the plaintiff’s attempt to remedy defects in his pleadings in an earlier case in which this court upheld the sustaining of demurrers. See Leventhal v. Dockser, 358 Mass. 799. Each count of his declarations in the new tort actions consumes approximately six pages of the printed record, as contrasted with approximately…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atwood v. FiskMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Leventhal v. DockserMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. FAMM Steel, Inc. v. Sovereign BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. LeventhalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Fischer v. Estate of FlaxDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Eley v. EvansDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  5. MacHinery Hauling, Inc. v. Steel of West VirginiaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API