Legal Opinion
In re Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 28, 2017No. 16-MD-2704 (PAE); 16-MC-2704 (PAE)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*441OPINION & ORDER
Paul A. Engelmayer, United States District Judge
This multi-district litigation involves claims, brought primarily under the antitrust laws, of unlawful collusion by investment banks who were dealers in the market for interest rate -swaps (“IRS” or “IRSs”). There are two groups of plaintiffs. The first consists of a putative class of investors who bought and sold IRSs between January 2008 and December 2016. They claim to have been subject to unfavorable pricing as a result of collusive actions among IRS dealers that impeded the development and later the survival of certain…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Russian Fed'nDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Iowa Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Alaska Elec. Pension Fund v. Bank of Am. Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Fire & Police Pension Ass'n of Colo v. Bank of MontrealDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.