Legal Opinion
Barberino Realty & Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 6, 1991No. 9067PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The plaintiff (Barberino) appeals from the decision of the trial court affirming the denial of its site plan application by the planning and zoning commission of Farmington (commission).
In its statement of issues on appeal, Barberino raises five claims. Pursuant to Practice Book § 4013, the commission filed a counterstatement of issues giving five reasons why the trial court’s judgment should be upheld, including alternate grounds on which we may sustain that judgment.
*394The statement of issues and counterstatement of issues present two questions dispositive of this appeal. First, whether…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kosinski v. LawlorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Allied Plywood, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- SSM Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Nauss v. PinkesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- W A T R, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barberino Realty & Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Barberino Realty & Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Arway v. Redding Zoning Commission, No. 31 22 34 (Mar. 10, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Giansanti v. Zoning Comm., Stratford, No. Cv92 29 10 58 S (Apr. 30, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Nassau Wood Indus. v. Plng./zng. Comm., No. Cv 92-0453643s (Jun. 17, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994