Legal Opinion

Sawyer v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 28, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. W. A. Spurrier, Judge. Action at law to recover tbe amount due on a promissory note. A jury was impaneled, and evidence was submitted, but at tbe close of tbe evidence tbe court directed a verdict for tbe plaintiff, and judgment was rendered in bear favor. Three of tbe five defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

*3981 *397Tbe note in suit is dated January 1, 1896, and is for tbe sum of one thousand dollars, payable to *398the plaintiff or order six months after its date, with interest. It was signed by the defendants O. J. Houston and D. B. Lyons, and by the defendants and appellants A. L. Campbell, E. A. Percival and Thomas Hatton. As originally drawn and signed, it was in form an ordinary negotiable promissory note, but before it was delivered there was written across its face the following: “Upon the written request of all the makers of this note, made on or before June 15,1896, the payee agrees that the time…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Benedict v. . CowdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Benton County Savings Bank of Norway v. BoddickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Cambridge Savings Bank v. HydeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  4. First National Bank v. LaughlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Coburn v. WebbIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vander Ploeg v. Van ZuukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Iowa National Bank v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. State Bank v. BilstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. Consolidated Construction Co. v. BegunckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. First National Bank v. McCartanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API