Legal Opinion

McCormic v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1983PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

This case involves a dispute between tenants, appellees here, and their landlords, who are the appellants. The tenants initiated the action which was brought both at common law and under the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, T.C.A. §§ 66-28-101 to -516. The landlords counterclaimed. Each side sought counsel fees pursuant to the terms of the statute, and a jury trial was demanded.

After a lengthy trial the jury awarded accrued rentals to the landlords but rendered a slightly larger judgment to the tenants for damages, both compensatory and punitive. The jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Howell v. Wallace E. Johnson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  3. Escue v. Lux Time Division of Robertshaw ControlsTennessee Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  2. State of Tennessee v. LaJuan HarbisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Robert Fahey v. Fabien Eldridge & Eldridge Auto Sales, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Cortez v. Alutech, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  5. State v. LawsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API