Legal Opinion

Alcorn v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 24, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for personal injuries under the Federal Employers' Liability Act. Title 45, U.S.C.A., sections 51-59, charging a violation of Section 2 of the Safety Appliance Act. The petition alleges that plaintiff was between the freight cars of an interstate train "because the same would not couple automatically by impact without the necessity of plaintiff's going between same for the purpose of adjusting the couplers and to aid in making the coupling." Defendant's answer set up both assumption of risk and that plaintiff's own negligence was the sole cause of his injuries. As to the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. LindsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Kimberling v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Truesdale v. WheelockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Gieseking v. Litchfield & Madison Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. Alcorn v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API