Legal Opinion
Haig & Haig, Limited v. Maradel Products, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 25, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, alleging trade-mark infringement under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1127, and dilution of its respective trade-marks under the New York State Anti-dilution Statute, § 368-d General Business Law, McKinney’s Consol. Laws, c. 20, moves pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 65 for a temporary injunction.
Plaintiff corporation is a distiller of a Scotch whisky known as “Pinch,” which has been registered as a trade-mark since July 5, 1955. Plaintiff also had registered in 1955 a trade-mark on its bottle with three indented sides (herein called “Pinch bottle”). The use of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Syntex Laboratories, Inc. v. Norwich Pharmacal Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- I. T. S. Industria Tessuti Speciali v. Aerfab Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Hershey Creamery Co. v. Hershey Chocolate Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Lucien Piccard Watch Corp. v. Since 1868 Crescent Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Continental Connector Corp. v. Continental Specialties Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1979