Legal Opinion

United States v. Graham Mortgage Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 17, 1983No. Crim. A. 82-80589PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR DISCOVERY OF GRAND JURY MATERIALS

JULIAN ABELE COOK, Jr., District Judge.

The United States [Government] commenced the above-entitled cause of action by filing an Indictment with the Court on December 3, 1982. The Indictment contained six Counts. Count I alleged that Defendants, Graham Mortgage Company [Graham], Richard E. Chapin [Chapin], Thomas P. Heinz [Heinz], and Manford Colbert [Colbert] “did knowingly, wilfully and unlawfully combine, conspire and agree together and with each other to commit an offense…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Catherine Mercado and Michael B. Kuknyo v. Calumet Federal Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Graham Mortgage Corp., Richard E. Chapin, Thomas P. HeinzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API