Spears v. Stewart
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion
*1005Statement of
Judge KOZINSKI,
with whom Circuit Judges O’SCANNLAIN, T.G. NELSON, GRABER and TALLMAN join, concerning the denial of the petitions for rehearing en banc:
For the second time in eight months, judges of this court have advised the public and the other courts of this circuit to ignore portions of an opinion that commands a majority of the panel that decided it. See also United States v. Johnson, 256 F.3d 895, 921 (9th Cir.2001) (Tashima, J., concurring) (“Because they are, in fact, dicta, subsequent panels are not bound either by [the majority’s] self-proclaimed ‘holding’ or by [its]…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Saenz v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Michael JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.