Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. v. Rosenberger

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 5, 1962No. Record 5384PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarrico, J.

Mattie Lee Rosenberger, the plaintiff, brought an action against The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, the defendant, seeking to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained when she fell in the defendant’s store in Winchester. A jury trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $1,000.00,. upon which the trial court entered final judgment. We granted the defendant a writ of error.

A number of errors are assigned to the actions of the trial court but, in the view we take of the case, it is necessary to consider only those which present the question of whether…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Knight v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  2. Acme Markets., Inc. v. RemschelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  3. Nehi Bottling Company v. LambertSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  4. Gottlieb v. AndrusSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  5. Gall v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Colonial Stores Inc. v. PulleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  2. Smith v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  3. Shiflett v. M. Timberlake, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  4. Leonard Allen Gauldin v. Virginia Winn-Dixie, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  5. Miracle Mart, Inc. v. WebbSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API