Legal Opinion

Barnes v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 27, 2011No. 124PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

In this case, we are asked to determine whether a person may use a motion to correct an illegal sentence as a means to challenge the requirement that he register as a sex offender, even though he does not claim the requirement is a sentence, and is no longer subject to any criminal penalties stemming from his sexual offense conviction. In 1998, Petitioner Kenneth Barnes pleaded guilty to third-degree sexual offense involving a minor under the age of 15. Following his conviction, Barnes was directed to register as a sexual offender pursuant to Maryland Code (1957, 1996 Repl.Vol., 1997 Cum.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Burch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Skok v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carter, Bowie, McCullough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Meyer v. State State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Farmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. State v. BustilloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API