State v. Bustillo
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
State of Maryland v. Juan Pablo Bustillo, No. 56, September Term 2021. Opinion by Gould, J. SENTENCING AND PUNISHMENT---PROBATION A trial court’s failure to articulate the duration of the defendant’s probation, as required by Maryland Rule 4-346(a), is a procedural error that must be raised at the trial level. SENTENCING AND PUNISHMENT---ILLEGAL SENTENCE A trial court did not impose an illegal sentence under Rule 4-346(a) when it failed to articulate the duration of the defendant’s probation. Circuit Court for Prince George’s County Case No.: CT181511X Argued: April 8, 2022 IN THE COURT OF…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Gatewood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Robinson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Hoile v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Hamrick v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Wharton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026