Legal Opinion

State v. Bustillo

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 24, 2022No. 56/21PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Juan Pablo Bustillo, No. 56, September Term 2021. Opinion by Gould, J. SENTENCING AND PUNISHMENT---PROBATION A trial court’s failure to articulate the duration of the defendant’s probation, as required by Maryland Rule 4-346(a), is a procedural error that must be raised at the trial level. SENTENCING AND PUNISHMENT---ILLEGAL SENTENCE A trial court did not impose an illegal sentence under Rule 4-346(a) when it failed to articulate the duration of the defendant’s probation. Circuit Court for Prince George’s County Case No.: CT181511X Argued: April 8, 2022 IN THE COURT OF…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Gatewood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Robinson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Hoile v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  2. Hamrick v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  3. Wharton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API