Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Third

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 1943No. 7 Div. 731PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

The bill of complaint seeks to cancel, set aside and hold for naught the deed under which respondent claims to own the lands involved, and a sale for division among the alleged joint owners of said lands. The trial court sustained demurrers to the bill and dismissed it. Hence this appeal.

In substance, the bill as amended alleges that complainants and respondent are all the heirs at law and next of kin of Julie Hawkins and her husband, P. F. Hawkins, both deceased. That on, to-wit, April 4, 1912, Julie Hawkins and her husband were occupying the lands involved as a part of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haslinger v. GabelIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Rhodes v. BlackSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  3. King v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Gamble v. MosloskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Little v. . LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McAdory v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Beason v. DukeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API