Legal Opinion

Sonnenschein v. Bartels

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1893No. 4676PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Doane, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

About June 30, 1888, the defendant Charles Bartels was the owner of a stock of merchandise situate at West Point, in Cuming county, Nebraska, and on this date sold it to Brazda Bros., of the same place, at the invoice price of $11,300. Of this sum, Brazda Bros, paid Bartels, at the time of the sale, $3,000 cash, and gave their promissory notes for $8,300, secured by the personal signatures of their friends living in said Cuming county. On Saturday, March 2, 1889, Brazda Bros, made an alleged sale and delivery of this stock of goods to the plaintiffs in error, for the alleged…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Knower v. Cadden Clothing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
  2. Sang v. BeersNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Gollober v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Beels v. FlynnNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Bollman v. LucasNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bartels v. SonnenscheinNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Sonnenschein v. BartelsNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Schrider v. TigheNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API