Legal Opinion

Bartels v. Sonnenschein

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1898No. 7781PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Blair, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This is the second appearance of the cause in this court. On the first submission the judgment of the trial court was affirmed. (Sonnenschein v. Bartels, 37 Neb. 592.) A rehearing was allowed and a second submission was taken, which resulted in a judgment of reversal, and the cause was remanded to the district court for further proceedings. (41 Neb. 703.) The action was for the conversion of a stock of general merchandise. The answer sets up two defenses, the first being matters in abatement to the suit, and the other relating to tin merits of the controversy. Upon the second trial in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. EdgertonNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Bartram v. ShermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Grimes v. ChamberlainNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Lewis v. BarkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. School District No. 49 v. CooperNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sorensen v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Greenamyre v. LandesNebraska Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API