Legal Opinion
(PS) Andreyev v. Chatigny
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 24, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02651Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EUGENE E. ANDREYEV, Case No. 2:24-cv-2651-TLN-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DANIEL CHATIGNY, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff alleges that defendants Daniel Chatigny, a county executive officer; Wayne Woo, 18 Placer County Sheriff; and certain Doe Placer County Sheriff’s Deputies violated his 19 constitutional rights. As articulated, the complaint does not state a viable claim, and so I will 20 dismiss it with leave to amend. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Devereaux v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.