Legal Opinion

Murray v. Murray

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1978No. 5788PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KIDWELL, J.

This appeal is from an order of the family court finding appellant in contempt and’ ordering his confinement for failure to pay alimony. There was no finding that appellant was able to pay the sum required to avoid confinement. We vacate the order and remand.

By a decree of absolute divorce, appellant was ordered to pay appellee, his former wife, alimony of $300 per month. Subsequently, appellant obtained an order to show cause why the alimony order should not be modified, and thereafter appellee obtained an order to show cause why, inter alia, appellant…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Oriel v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Barrett v. BarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Horn v. District Court, Ninth Judicial DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. LeMay v. LeanderHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hawaii Public Employment Relations Board v. United Public Workers, Local 646Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Evans v. TakaoHawaii Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API