Legal Opinion
Sherfel v. Gassman
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 27, 2010No. 2:09-cv-871PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge.
This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201. The plaintiffs are Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”), an Ohio corporation; the Benefits Administrative Committee (“the Committee”), Plan Administrator of the Nationwide-Sponsored Health and Welfare Employee Benefit Plans; and Joan Sherfel, a member of the Committee. Nationwide is the Plan Sponsor of the Plans, and…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sherfel v. GassmanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Dickten Masch Plastics, LLC v. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2016