Legal Opinion
Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 31, 1941No. 538PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs bring this action against the United States under the provisions of 28 U. S.C.A. §§ 41 (28), 43-48, to set aside an order of the Interstate'Commerce Commission. A three-judge court was duly convened. The Interstate Commerce Commission, the State of Minnesota, the Railroad and Warehouse Commission of the State of Minnesota, the Minneapolis Traffic Association, the Chamber of Commerce of Eargo, North Dakota, and the Public Service Commission of North Dakota intervened as party defendants.
Complaint was laid before the Interstate Commerce Commission by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Western Paper Makers' Chemical Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ace Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1960
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1963
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- State of Minnesota v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.