Legal Opinion

Norfolk and Western Railway Company v. J. Waselchalk.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 18, 1992No. Record 911824PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whiting

The sole issue here is whether a prescriptive right-of-way can be acquired over a public utility’s property, which property is being used for a public purpose.

On March 1, 1851, William B. Potts and Charity S. Potts, his wife, conveyed a strip of land running generally east and west across their farm (the Potts-Stanfield farm) to the South Side Railroad Company (South Side) for the construction and operation of a railroad. Because the strip of land bisected the farm, South Side constructed a crossing that connected the two portions, as required by statute, 1 and that its successor, the Norfolk…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Preshlock v. BrennerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. Great Falls Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  3. City of Lynchburg v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. A & M Properties, Inc. v. Norfolk Southern Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mississippi Export Railroad v. RouseMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  3. A & M Properties, Inc. v. Norfolk Southern Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Lee v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.Salem County Circuit Court · 2006
  5. Mississippi Export Railroad Company, Inc. v. Malcolm E. RouseMississippi Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API