Legal Opinion

Mississippi Export Railroad v. Rouse

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 2006No. 2004-CA-00503-SCTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

DICKINSON, Justice,

for the Court.

¶ 1. The motion for rehearing is denied. The original opinion is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted therefor.

¶ 2. This is a claim of prescriptive easement by private citizens who presented uncontradicted proof of continuous use of a private crossing over active railroad tracks for over fifty years. The question presented is whether active railroad tracks are “public highways” as provided by Article 7, § 184, of the Mississippi Constitution and, therefore, immune from prescriptive easement.

BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

¶ 3. In…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Briel v. City of NatchezMississippi Supreme Court · 1873
  2. City of Vicksburg v. MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Preshlock v. BrennerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  4. Witherspoon v. City of MeridianMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  5. L. & N. Railroad v. HaganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API