Mississippi Export Railroad v. Rouse
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
DICKINSON, Justice,
for the Court.
¶ 1. The motion for rehearing is denied. The original opinion is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted therefor.
¶ 2. This is a claim of prescriptive easement by private citizens who presented uncontradicted proof of continuous use of a private crossing over active railroad tracks for over fifty years. The question presented is whether active railroad tracks are “public highways” as provided by Article 7, § 184, of the Mississippi Constitution and, therefore, immune from prescriptive easement.
BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
¶ 3. In…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Briel v. City of NatchezMississippi Supreme Court · 1873
- City of Vicksburg v. MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1882
- Preshlock v. BrennerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Witherspoon v. City of MeridianMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
- L. & N. Railroad v. HaganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011