Legal Opinion
Mayoral-Amy v. BHI Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided June 29, 1998No. 98-573 CIV-KINGPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF ADDITIONAL TIME IN WHICH TO PERFECT SERVICE TO DEFENDANTS
JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendants BHI Corporation (“BHI”), Michael A. Ashcroft (“Ashcroft”) and John M. Searle’s (“Searle”) Motion to Dismiss for Insufficiency of Service of Process, filed June 5, 1998. Defendants assert that Plaintiff failed to effectuate appropriate service of process as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Factual Summary
Plaintiffs pro se Complaint, filed March 12, 1998, brings…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Prewitt Enterprises, Inc. v. Organization of Petroleum Exporting CountriesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Hilska v. JonesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Broadfoot v. Diaz (In Re International Telemedia Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
- Marks v. Alfa GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.