Turk v. United States

Defendant was convicted on two counts charging the sale of intoxicating liquor, and on a third count charging possession. The sentences were concurrent.

The first count charged a sale to a named purchaser “in Oklahoma County, in the Western District of the State of Oklahoma”; the second count was the same, except as to the date.

The only error relied upon is that the information was fatally defective in not alleging the place of the commission of the crime more specifically. The decisions of the Eighth Circuit in Turk v. United States (C. C. A.) 20 F.(2d) 129, and Partson v. United States (C.…