Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Valle v. Valle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1983No. 82-338PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

Plaintiff Clarita Valle filed a complaint for support under the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA). (111. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 40, par. 1201 et seq.) The complaint alleged that defendant Mario Valle was the father of plaintiff’s two children and owed them a duty of support, and that defendant was in arrears in support payments. In his answer, defendant denied that he was the father of the children and that he owed them a duty of support. On January 13, 1981, an order was entered which purportedly dismissed plaintiff’s complaint and which continued the matter for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. BarnhartIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. O'DONNELL v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Dorsey v. DorseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Joliet Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. O'Hare International BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Cardenas v. CardenasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of WeinbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508 v. RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Horch v. PonikCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API