Edenton v. Heckler
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, Chief Judge.
The attorney for plaintiff Benjamin Edenton, who successfully challenged in this court the Secretary’s denial of Social Security benefits for the plaintiff, has petitioned this court to approve his request for a fee of $6,493.52, representing 25% of the plaintiff’s past due benefits plus $61.72 for court costs (Paper No. 14). In support of this petition, the attorney has submitted an itemization for services rendered to the plaintiff.
An attorney may receive up to 25% of the total past due benefits as a fee under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). 1 However, approval…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Mckittrick v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Blankenship v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Redden v. CelebrezzeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Kathleen L. Morris v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Losco v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Donahoe v. BowenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Stocks v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1989