Legal Opinion

Redden v. Celebrezze

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 8, 1966No. Nos. 10156, 10160PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:

In Lambert v. Celebrezze, 4 Cir., 361 F.2d 677, and Redden v. Celebrezze, 4 Cir., 361 F.2d 815, we held that the maximum fee allowable to the attorney for the claimant of disability benefits under the Social Security Act was twenty-five per cent of the accrued benefits payable to the claimant and his dependents by reason of the Court’s judgment. In petitions for rehearing, the Secretary urges that we revise our holding to limit the fee base to accrued benefits held to be payable to the claimant on his own behalf. The matter has received the consideration of the entire…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lovel Redden v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  2. James B. Lambert v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Rodriquez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Glendal B. Webb v. Elliot L. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  3. Eugene Lewis v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  4. McDannel v. ApfelDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1999
  5. Mckittrick v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API