Legal Opinion

Wright v. Village of Portland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1898PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Case by Guy Wright and Cornelius Franks, infants, against the village of Portland, for injury to land. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiffs sued defendant to recover damages for inj ury done to their lands by seepage from a pond owned by defendant, and for entering upon the land of plaintiffs, and removing therefrom about 900 yards of gravel. Defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice, by way of defense, that a verified and itemized claim had not been presented to the village council for audit and allowance, as required by section 7, chap. 5, Act No. 3, Pub. Acts 1895, under which act the village is incorporated. At the trial, objection was made to the introduction of any testimony, for the reason that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Canfield v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Germaine v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Griswold v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ridgeway v. City of EscanabaMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Holtham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Lindley v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Sprague v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Foster v. Village of BellaireMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API