Legal Opinion

United States v. Ailsworth

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 18, 1996No. 94-40017-01-SACPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, District Judge.

The long history preceding the trial of the defendant, Jesse Ailsworth, is contained in this court’s May 7, 1996 memorandum and order. See United States v. Ailsworth, 927 F.Supp. 1438 (D.Kan.1996). Prior to trial, all of Ailsworth’s eodefendants entered guilty pleas. When the second superseding indictment was originally filed, it contained forty-five counts. Before trial, eight counts of the second superseding indictment were dismissed. Specifically, Counts 34, 37 and 40 through 45 were dismissed. Ailsworth was charged in each of the remaining…

2Cases cited116 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Jessie Ailsworth, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. BurchDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  4. United States v. WaltersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  5. United States v. AilsworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API