Legal Opinion
Harbert v. Rapp
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 30, 1976No. Civ. 75-0634-DPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
es
In this Civil Rights action Plaintiff accus-the Defendants of having discriminated against her in employment on account of sex. The action is alleged to arise under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 and 2000e et seq., the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments, and Executive Orders 11246 and 11375. Jurisdiction is asserted under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 & 1343(3).
Plaintiff alleges she has been an employee of the Oklahoma Employment Service Commission since 1964. She was initially employed as a counsellor intern. She has been promoted to the level of counsellor III. She has obtained…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Curran v. Portland Superintending School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1977
- Alice BOBO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ITT, CONTINENTAL BAKING COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Jeetendra Bhandari v. First National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Turner v. Unification ChurchDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1978
- Martin v. Easton Publishing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.